Chinese Document Formatting Practices Criticized
A trending discussion on Zhihu questions the manual numbering and citation of documents, as well as manual indentation, highlighting the inefficiency of these practices. A trending discussion on Zhihu questions the prevalent manual methods used for numbering documents, adding captions, and indenting text in China. Participants question the difficulty of adopting automated features. Many documents originating from schools are manually numbered, and footnotes are always cited manually. Participants express frustration with this inefficient method, questioning why automated features are not more widely adopted.
Topics
Developing
- 863d Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore.
- 863d Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- 863d Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est.
- 862d Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium.
Sources · 7 independent
Zhihu Trending
“很多从学校得到的文档都是手动编号,题注从来都是手动引用。据说还有手动打空格进行「缩进」的。他们这样做不累吗?为什么使用自动化的功能就那么难呢?”
Chinese Students Manually Number Documents, Cite Inefficiency
“Chinese Students Manually Number Documents, Cite Inefficiency”
CRI Huayu Global
“Chinese Students Manually Number Documents, Cite Inefficiency”
Unlock the full story
Get a Pro subscription or above to see the live story progression and the full list of independent sources confirming each event as they happen.
Log in to upgrade