Hangzhou Court Upholds AI-Related Job Dismissal
Topics
Developing
- 862d Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore.
- 862d Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- 862d Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est.
- 862d Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium.
Sources · 7 independent
“Sąd Pośredni w Hangzhou orzekł, że sztuczna inteligencja nie stanowi podstawy do rozwiązania umowy o pracę”
“法院的判斷是說當天颱風天的這個狀況...法院判斷是那一天是不是對勞工來講這個勞工來講是屬於安全的一個狀態...因為捷運它畢竟是大眾交通工具...它是有一個公領域的色彩”
“法院認為說這個契約 實質上從雙方的互動關係 來看的話 然後還有領薪水的狀況來看的話 其實這個外送員 他跟公司之間還是屬於勞基法 保障了勞工的一個僱傭的關係”
“法院認為說這個契約 如果從雙方的互動關係來看的話...其實這個外送員，他跟公司之間還是屬於勞基法保障了勞工的一個僱傭的關係。”
“訴訟 對那法院的判 所以有了公司就說你上課你就不能夠享有這個... 也就是說公司不能夠因為你位高權重 他為了要規避掉給你一些... 退休金或者是之前費... 他就故意說你是屬於我”
“法院判 的還是一樣你就是屬於勞工 這時候基本上公司就不能夠因為你的頭銜 然後來去迴避掉不給你一些屬於勞工身份該有的東西”
“So, at this time, there will be differences. Of course, some people will be unwilling and will file lawsuits. The court's ruling remains the same: you are still considered a worker. Basically, a company cannot use your title to avoid giving you the benefits that come with worker status.”
“訴訟 對那法院的判 還是一樣你就是屬於勞工 這時候基本上公司就不能夠因為你的頭銜 然後來去迴避掉不給你一些屬於勞工身份該有的東西”
“The tech worker was employed at an AI-related firm in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou. He earned close to $44,000 a year before AI took over his job.”
Unlock the full story
Get a Pro subscription or above to see the live story progression and the full list of independent sources confirming each event as they happen.
Log in to upgrade