Academic Freedom Index Criticizes US Science Funding
Topics
Developing
- 863d Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore.
- 863d Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- 863d Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est.
- 863d Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium.
Sources · 7 independent
“Interrupted historian Patrick McCray says dismantling the National Science Board is not in the best interests of either the nation or Trump”
“the Trump administration really plays all the cards it has to politicize science and to, in this case, politicize peer review.”
“The peer review Catherine Spokov has conventionally gone up to the level of national science policy in the United States, determining the direction of research for 75 years in the country.”
“peer review Catherine Spokov has conventionally gone up to the level of national science policy in the United States, determining the direction of research for 75 years in the country.”
Unlock the full story
Get a Pro subscription or above to see the live story progression and the full list of independent sources confirming each event as they happen.
Log in to upgrade