Gene Editing Debate Explores 'Better Babies' and Ethics

The use of gene editing technology is being debated, with proponents arguing for its potential to prevent diseases like cystic fibrosis and HIV. They said a moral obligation to use the technology to reduce human suffering and make humanity less vulnerable to pathogens. Opponents raise concerns about creating a 'haves and have-nots' society, where designer babies are accessible only to the wealthy. Arguments for the motion highlight potential benefits with safeguards against abuse, while opponents raise questions about the godlike power in human hands and the potential for competition for 'perfect babies.' The debate considers subtracting, adding, or substituting DNA in cells, with a focus on FDA-approved use of gene editing in babies after extensive safety improvements and testing. Potential risks include off-target effects, slippery slopes, unneeded enhancements, high costs, and unknown impacts on future generations.