AI Mystery Continues in Scientific Research
Topics
Developing
- 863d Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore.
- 863d Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- 863d Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est.
- 863d Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium.
Sources · 7 independent
“Matthew Shragg's first exercise in validating scientific research was unofficial. It came during his PhD training when he tried to reproduce the findings of a paper that had parallels.”
“the result is that not only did their figure not match the... that the world has agreed upon as the best estimate. So there is some good in it in that they've figured out perhaps why it doesn't match well with the previous experiment, some ways in which the previous experiment may have gone wrong. But overall, it just still shows us we're not there yet. This mystery continues, why it is so, so, so hard to still pin it down. And Stefan Schlaminger, who led this study, he said, it's like Everest, you know, we...”
Unlock the full story
Get a Pro subscription or above to see the live story progression and the full list of independent sources confirming each event as they happen.
Log in to upgrade