Court Establishes New Racial Discrimination Test
A court has struck down a redistricting map, ruling that it constituted an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. This section applies to congressional maps, state legislatures, city councils, and school board elections where racially polarized voting occurs. The goal is to ensure minority voters have the opportunity to elect their preferred candidates. The decision could allow legislatures to break up concentrations of minority voters to benefit political parties. This action could be taken by both Republican and Democratic legislatures, according to the report. Previously, Section 2 cases required showing that white and minority voters preferred different candidates and that minority voters typically lost. The ruling may allow legislatures in states like Florida to redistrict without accounting for these specific racial dynamics.
Topics
Developing
- 892d Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore.
- 892d Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- 892d Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est.
- 892d Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium.
Sources · 7 independent
“The court struck down that... map saying it amounted to an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The ruling weakens Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which was intended to prevent racial discrimination.”
“I think this is one of the most important and most map saying it amounted to an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The ruling weakens Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.”
“discrimination and we've seen that about whether that's requiring people to pay as a result of a racial gerrymander, a partisan gerrymander”
“Any place where there's racially polarized vote. at the size of the districts, look at whether whites and minority voters prefer different candidates, and draw districts whenever there's the possibility that minority voters would not get a chance to elect their candidates of choice.”
“Any place where there's racially polarized vote... these jurisdictions have had to draw these districts to give minority voters a chance. Now all of those districts are potentially going to be dismantled.”
“These jurisdictions have had to draw these districts to give minority voters a chance. Now all of those districts are potentially going to be dismantled.”
“One of the requirements, as it was understood until today's decision, was that there had to be racially polarized voting, where white voters and minority voters prefer different candidates and minority voters usually lost.”
“he wondered, should there be a time limit on the ability of states to conduct race-based redistricting? He wrote it couldn't extend indefinitely.”
“But on Wednesday by a six to three vote, the courts republican appointees in the majority, the democratic appointees in dissent, the court installed a new test, one that kicks in if lawmakers had intended to discriminate against minority voters.”
Unlock the full story
Get a Pro subscription or above to see the live story progression and the full list of independent sources confirming each event as they happen.
Log in to upgrade