Justice Kagan Dissents In Voting Rights Case
Justice Kagan noted that a president previously described Haiti as a "filthy, dirty, and disgusting" country. The Justice highlighted statements where the president associated illegal immigrants linked to TPS with "poisoning the blood of America." These comments were cited to suggest a discriminatory purpose may have influenced the decision. Justice Kagan cited discriminatory language in a case involving Temporary Protected Status (TPS). Justice Barrett, who has two adopted Haitian children, interjected to clarify the administration's position. The discussion addressed whether individuals with TPS status could bring a challenge based on race discrimination. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan wrote a dissent in a case at the High Court. Kagan stated that the central tenet of the Voting Rights Act has been effectively demolished.
Topics
Developing
- 863d Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore.
- 863d Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- 863d Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est.
- 863d Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium.
Sources · 7 independent
“He declared illegal immigrants, which he associated with TPS, as poisoning the blood of America. I don't see how that one statement is not a prime example showing that a discriminatory purpose may have played important in this decision.”
“individuals with TPS status could bring a challenge based on race discrimination?”
“prompting this response from Justice Jackson, the only black location. Markets, Justice LLC. And from proven woman on the court. So you're just in the position of the United States is that we have an actual racial epithet”
“The central tenant of the Voting Rights Act has been effectively demolished. That's the opinion of Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, who wrote in her dissent in a landmark case at the High Court.”
Unlock the full story
Get a Pro subscription or above to see the live story progression and the full list of independent sources confirming each event as they happen.
Log in to upgrade