MPs Reject Investigation Into Peter Mandelson Appointment
Topics
Developing
- 863d Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore.
- 863d Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- 863d Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est.
- 863d Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium.
Sources · 7 independent
“We've had the McSweeney testimony, we've had the Barton testimony, both of which raised real issues about how this decision to appoint Peter Maddison took place, how it was pushed through government in what clearly was an irregular style.”
“was pushed through government in what clearly was an irregular style. Yeah. So let's just say that Morgan McSweeney was Kirstalmer's chief of staff at the time”
“the thing which Kirsten Dahmer will not be able to get away from is the fact that the appointment was announced before the vetting could possibly have been conducted.”
“the way the decision was carried out and investigated and the following of due process remains rather murky.”
“MPs have decided not to get a committee to look into his claims that full due process was followed. Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister Darren Jones defended his boss.”
Unlock the full story
Get a Pro subscription or above to see the live story progression and the full list of independent sources confirming each event as they happen.
Log in to upgrade