US Supreme Court Halts Mifepristone Ruling
The Department of Justice under President Trump may ask the Supreme Court to intervene regarding the guilty verdict in the E. Jean Carroll case. The Department of Justice may request the Supreme Court's intervention regarding the civil verdict against the president. Two Mifepristone manufacturers had asked the court to intervene with an emergency ruling. Manufacturers of mifepristone asked the court to weigh in with an emergency decision regarding access to the drug. The ruling allows women seeking to end a pregnancy to obtain the medication. This action keeps the drug widely available. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had previously ruled that mifepristone must be prescribed and dispensed in person. Justices have been granted more time to review the matter. The Supreme Court has intervened in the legal battle over the abortion pill mifepristone.
Topics
Developing
- 864d Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore.
- 864d Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- 864d Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est.
- 864d Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium.
Sources · 7 independent
“put a $100 deposit on this new mobile phone, and then this... campaign. There's new reporting that the Department of Justice under President Trump may ask the Supreme Court to intervene on the guilty verdict that was levied against the president in the eGN Carroll case.”
“the Supreme Court stayed the ban. The Supreme Court 's ruling came after two Mifipristone manufacturers asked the court to weigh in with an emergency”
“pill. The ruling allows women seeking to end a pregnancy to get...”
“this Supreme Court this evening keeps the abortion pill M ifepristone widely available. Issue in an emergency order that temporarily halts a lower”
“pausing a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that would have required Mifepristone to be prescribed and dispensed in person”
“required Mifepristone to be described to be prescribed and dispensed in person . The high court decision essentially gives justices more time to”
“prescriptions for Mifepristone, while Louisiana's legal challenge to the FDA's dispensing rules proceeds.”
“The Supreme Court eventually ruled the president's widespread tariffs illegal.”
Unlock the full story
Get a Pro subscription or above to see the live story progression and the full list of independent sources confirming each event as they happen.
Log in to upgrade