South Africa's Highest Court Orders Ramaphosa Impeachment Probe
The ruling will determine if Parliament should have voted to block moves to impeach the president. This decision concerns the Assembly's December 2022 vote to reject the Section 89 independent panel report. The report investigated President Cyril Ramaphosa's Phala Phala scandal. A South African court is currently considering whether the case involving President Ramaphosa and Palla Palla should proceed. This structure was adopted to ensure checks and balances, addressing past misuse of power when one party held a majority. The current ruling is seen as a step in this direction. South Africa's Parliament has noted and respects the Constitutional Court's judgment on the Pala Pala matter, describing it as a ruling. The institution stated it will require careful legal and procedural consideration.
Topics
Developing
- 862d Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore.
- 862d Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- 862d Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est.
- 862d Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium.
Sources · 7 independent
“South Africa's constitutional court is due to decide today on whether Parliament should have voted to block moves to impeach President Cyril Ramaphosa.”
“South Africa's Constitutional Court is due to decide today on whether Parliament should have voted to block moves to impeach President Cyril Ramaphosa.”
“the National Assembly acted unlawfully when it voted in December 2022 to reject the Section 89 independent panel report into President Sola Ramaposa's Palla Palla scandal.”
“whether the case around Ramaposa and Palla Palla should actually be considered.”
“they resulted to giving us a government where every individual must come to the so-called government of national unity for us to be able to get a 50 plus one.”
“constitutional court's ruling on the Pala Pala matter brings a long-awaited clarity.”
“stop the impeachment committee hearing? Well, he's definitely in a much more”
“Parliament says it has noted and respects the Constitutional Court's judgment on the Pala Pala matter, describing it as a significant ruling that will require careful legal and procedural consideration.”
“Sprengkraft für Südafrikas Staatsoberhaupt Ramaphosa. Nach Ansicht des Verfassungsgerichts hat das Parlament...”
“Parliament voted against starting impeachment proceedings. Now, the country's highest court has ruled that was a mistake and ordered that an impeachment committee be set up to investigate.”
Unlock the full story
Get a Pro subscription or above to see the live story progression and the full list of independent sources confirming each event as they happen.
Log in to upgrade