Historical Incident Revisited In Retrospective Coverage
The source appears to be archive, anniversary, or historical retrospective coverage of a past event. Treat it as background context rather than a newly reported incident unless the source states a current new development.
Topics
Developing
- 863d Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore.
- 863d Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- 863d Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est.
- 863d Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium.
Sources · 7 independent
BCC News Taiwan
“结果他在关键时刻，我个人认为，因为总统谈合案在中华民国的历史上，这次是宪政史上第一次，非常值得记录一下，到底谁去投票，到底谁不去投票，对吧？结果在关键时刻，你当然可以表达你的立场，但你的立场竟然是选择不出席。为什么？民进党选择不出席。 五个人大于八个人，也就是说，因为那三个不认同的人没有出席，所以他们五个人全票通过，这个实现案就出来了。五个人全票通过，完全不用考虑所谓的法定数，人数，这个实现案就出来了。比照大法官会议，今天民进党如果在5月19日那天没有出席，”
Unlock the full story
Get a Pro subscription or above to see the live story progression and the full list of independent sources confirming each event as they happen.
Log in to upgrade