Travel Agency Held 30% Liable For Hiking Accident
Topics
Developing
- 863d Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore.
- 863d Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- 863d Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est.
- 863d Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium.
Sources · 7 independent
“法官指出 被告作為組織本次活動的旅遊經營者 應當在合理範圍內承擔安全保障義務 而針對所謂的免責聲明 民法典第506條規定 免除人身傷害責任的條款是無效的”
“领队未采取安全保障措施 而是让其独自返回 这构成了救助环节的重大疏漏 应当承担相应的责任”
“The court finally ruled that the defendant travel agency bears 30% of the responsibility. The Shanghai Songjiang Court also heard another case related to outdoor tourism.”
“The court finally ruled that the defendant travel agency bears 30% of the responsibility.”
“这家旅行社也被判定承担30%的责任 法官提醒户外途部活动的参与者 對自身安全有注意義務 法院最终判定被告旅行社一方承担30%的责任”
“这家旅行社也被判定承担30%的责任... 涉案的旅行社第一次组织前往这条未经开发的线路 当天下雨山路湿滑 原告郭女士在一处斗魄摔倒 竟被判定构成九级伤残”
“这家旅行社也被判定承担30%的责任... 涉案的旅行社第一次组织前往这条未经开发的线路 当天下雨山路湿滑,原告郭女士在一处斗魄摔倒,既定构成九级伤残。”
“这家旅行社也被判定承担30%的责任... 涉案的旅行社第一次组织前往这条未经开发的线路 当天下雨山路湿滑 原告郭女士在一处斗魄摔倒 经建定构成九级伤残”
Unlock the full story
Get a Pro subscription or above to see the live story progression and the full list of independent sources confirming each event as they happen.
Log in to upgrade